At last a mainstream newspaper has covered the fact that the English will soon be a minority in the UK. The Telegraph article “White British people will be a minority in 40 years, report claims” points out that minority status will be reached by 2060 (35 yrs from now). However, the demographics are far worse than this.
Notice how the Telegraph and Matt Goodwin have fallen into the trap laid by the ONS and government. ‘White British’ really means ‘English’ in this context. It is not about black and white - there are ‘White non-English’ and indeed, the White non-English are a major factor in the replacement of the English. The story is actually about English people disappearing. It is about a whole race being destroyed by New Racists (such as the staff at the ONS who call the English ‘White British’).
Truly mass migration has been occurring since Tony Blair’s government desired to “rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date”. The Conservatives then enthusiastically used mass migration to provide cheap labour after 2010. It is only about 25 years since Blair began the increased flow. This means that migrants are mostly younger people. Migrants are only 7% of the over 70 year olds yet they exceed 40% of the under 40 year olds. Once over 50% of school children are no longer English it will be inevitable that the English are doomed to become a minority. This will happen in 2032-2035.
Some of us, myself included, have been guilty of saying that our replacement by foreigners is the result of losing any religion. This is not true. What happened is that we lost our determination to be English.
Being English was always about free speech coupled with tolerance, independence and fairness. Somebody could call you fat but you tolerated it or swore back at them. “Sticks and stones might break my bones but names will never hurt me”. The English were robust, they would use nicknames to describe people from foreign parts whether the parts were Pakistan or Surrey. Being English was to be tough minded and to be free and speak as freely as you felt. It was also to be polite of your own volition without laws imposing that politeness. The English were both free and polite. It was a paradox at the heart of their greatness.
This was not about religion. It was about freedom. English people hated oppression.
Sadly for us the Internationalists happened. At first they just wanted cheap labour. When the English workers spoke freely about the cheap, imported labour the Internationalists introduced laws against free speech (Race Relations Act 1965). The laws banned speech against foreigners. It was called the ‘Race’ Relations Act but it protected all foreign labour, white and black. All subsequent legislation on ‘race’ relations is directed at protecting foreigners, not just physical race, and includes speech as a harm.
Unfortunately the Internationalists dominated Parliament and obscured the issue of removing the Right of the English to free speech by moralising about racism. The people who dominated Parliament were all upper and middle class and they regarded ordinary English people as low class scum. These upper classes were the real racists (see The New Racism). The mass media were from the same group and started a massive propaganda campaign to make gagging the English into a ‘moral’ crusade.
It was in 1965 that the English should have risen up against oppression. It is our most fundamental right to speak freely. If you feel harmed then speak freely back. If you sulk and get a policeman to use a law to bully someone who you think has harmed you by their speech you are not English.
We have not lost our religion. We have lost our country. The governing, Internationalist class has taken from us our greatness. We were free. We could say what we liked to each other and laugh about it. They have taken this away.
Once the Internationalists had succeeded at persecuting any objections to foreign labour they realized that they could use the same technique for all their pet ideologies. Each new policy for changing society was accompanied by a ban on any direct speech opposing it. It rapidly became illegal to be free and English.
Wokery actually started in 1965 with the first legislation to ban the working class from objecting to replacement in the workplace. It gathered huge momentum in the late 1980s with the Public Order Act 1986 and reached a near crescendo in 2010 with the Equality Act. These laws allowed the government to impose social change and then gag any opposition.
The most irritating aspect of these changes is the moralising. The Internationalist moralisers do not have any special direct line to God or gods. Their argument is that your speech might harm someone. But by suppressing your freedom and free speech they harm you, right at the heart of your being. You have the right to be English and it is for you, individually, to decide whether you want to be careful of hurting someone’s feelings or flippantly want to just say what you are thinking. If you don’t like the way someone is behaving or don’t like being replaced by people from elsewhere you should be able to tell them and they should be able to reply. English people are defined by freedom. Free Speech is not a ‘harm’, it is England.
How dare these latter day vicars of social order presume to control your thoughts and words? Why did decent English people keep voting for these authoritarian Internationalists?
There is no need for a new religion. The English must become themselves again before it is too late. Once the English are replaced any chance of recovering freedom in this island is gone. Our hope is to stop voting Labour, Conservative and LibDem and demand that our freedom is returned.
Governments must never again be allowed to couple their social policies to laws that ban us from speaking openly.
(If you want to save a country that is English for your children please publicise the truth. Restack, tweet and spread this article so that the English do not die out because they didn’t know what is happening.)
Internationalists are your Enemy
The UK is undergoing an undeclared civil war between Internationalists and Nationalists. Who are the Internationalists? What do they believe?
More Detail
This is serious. The use of the law to dictate the spoken relations between people is the hallmark of tyranny. It is what stopped the Soviets and Russians from daring to talk freely except in private with the most trusted friends. It is why the Chinese can no longer say anything about beliefs and limit their behaviour to materialism. It is what sent those who spoke in sympathy with the Jews to the concentration camps.
The laws since 1965 that have persecuted the English are now leading to the replacement of an entire people. Labour has led this lawfare against the English.
But the Internationalist Tories and LibDems are as bad.
The success of the Internationalists at destroying English working class culture is amazing. They have replaced their enemy with foreigners. Only the old are now mostly the original English:
(Source: ONS)(The upward bulge is probably due to 20 to 30yrs being near the peak age for legal migration. The graph contains census figures, many migrants do not complete the census returns so the figures are probably 5% or more too low. We know from school figures that 40% of 5-18 year olds are of migrant origin).
This replacement has been particularly effective against the working class. The original English working class have been decimated, especially in large cities such as Birmingham, London and Manchester, where the original English are minorities. There is now no chance of integration - you cannot integrate with a minority English population.
(Source: ONS Dataset TS021)
The original English will be an inevitable minority in the whole country by the early 2030s as the children of migrants become the future population.
(Sources: School Pupils and their Characteristics 2021-24, Archive (click ‘See other releases’), Wikipedia Demographics of UK, Govt hides White British stats at bottom of tables - see Create your own table where 61.3% White British in 2024 can be found using the thin slider on right. For ‘White British’ read English, the ONS etc. use ‘White British’ to make the English sound racist).
The New Population will not have the same politics as the English:
There is a prevalent myth that England has a huge elderly population that needs massive migration to provide care services. In fact England has a population pyramid with a relatively large under 65 year old population. It is not top heavy with the elderly.
Population Pyramid for England
When you hear Internationalists claim that the UK needs migration to support the old you should know that they are lying. Care for the elderly cannot be solved by migration. If the UK were to increase the base of the population pyramid it would soon need ever increasing numbers of migrants to support ever increasing numbers of older people. The country would fill up and be destroyed within 50-80 years if migration continued at 1 million net a year (migrants are young and have children). That would certainly, finally stop migration.
The ‘migrants are needed for health and care’ argument is a staple of Internationalism. This is wrong for two reasons.
Firstly, only 16% of migrants come to work in these sectors. 84% work elsewhere and 13% of the migrants are needed for the health and care needs of migrants (ie: only about 3% are surplus health and care workers).
Secondly, the idea that we should happily replace the English and their culture of freedom because some older English people need care is absurd. It treats English people and their culture as worthless. It is pure Internationalism. It is New Racism.
The New Racism
There are two forms of oppressive reaction to race. Internationalists use the New Racism: the desire to remove all racial differences to eradicate race in their country and in the world. Traditionalists express their racism as the removal or oppression of people with a different race from themselves. Both are seeking racial purity, New Racists want …
This is civic nationalism?
"English people are defined by freedom"
The logical endpoint of that way of thinking, is that one would prefer our institutions of "freedom" to be saved instead of Anglo-Saxons as a people.
We can survive tyranny. North Korea and East Germany preserve their peoples better than liberal South Korea and West Germany.
In addition, there has been plenty of tyranny in our past that hasn't destroyed our Englishness