The Uniparty is our fault!
John Sydenham
Since Tony Blair became Prime Minister in 1997 there has been only one party in UK politics. Many people call this the Uniparty. What does this party represent?
There are two ideas of a country. In the first it is an area of land that is moulded for the good of its children. The adults have a clear idea of what is a good life and create institutions, urban environments, industries, customs etc. that enshrine this good life. In the second a country is a place where ‘human resources’ are housed. The Uniparty has the second idea.
Having reduced a country to a place for housing human resources the Uniparty is then faced with how to mobilise this workforce for industry and how to control dissent. The resources are managed like farm animals: their health is treated and food and accommodation provided so they can go to work.
The hallmark of the Uniparty is the slogan Change! The Party believes in ‘modernisation’. What do the Labour and Tory wings of the Uniparty mean when they say this? In an economy the corporations that introduce new products that sell well are successful. The economy is one fad after another. The net result is change and modernisation. This is what Uniparty leaders mean when they cry “Change!”. Change is the perpetual turnover of industries and staff facilities in a perpetually modernising economy (what they call society).
The Uniparty has two ideological roots.
On the Left of the Uniparty the root is Marxism. Marxism is a belief that religions, families and individuals are ‘bourgeois’ and industry should be controlled by a totalitarian state in the name of the workers. A Marxist state is the idea that the country is an economy and nothing else. In the 20th century it became apparent that this state control of industry always fails.
In the 21st century nearly all Marxist countries have now become Post-Marxist with Marxist totalitarianism plus capitalist industry that obeys the state. The Labour Party has a Post-Marxist ideology. Post-Marxism is an authoritarian social system plus capitalist industry. This is also known as National Socialism. Don’t be fooled by the ‘National’ in National Socialism, National Socialists have always been imperialists and globalists who are supported by big business.
On the right of the Uniparty the ideological root is corporate globalism. In the UK this philosophy is derived from attitudes that were prevalent in the days of the British Empire. The idea is that the world is composed of human resources that can be used for the enrichment of international trading companies (multinational corporations and international banks). The Conservative Party are corporate globalists.
Both wings of the Uniparty believe that change and modernisation will eventually create a global government. The global government will oversee the free movement of people, money and trade across the world. The political term that describes both wings of the Uniparty is Internationalism.
Internationalism is highly dangerous. The greatest danger is that by reducing government to economics its supporters have no principles. ‘Economics’ sounds like a clever thing but it is, simply, money. Reducing all aspirations to money leads to corruption, both moral and material. (See The Real Tony Blair).
The Uniparty might seem to have power but the real sources of power are the Large Corporations and their media, the International Banks and fully National Socialist states such as China.
The alternative to the Uniparty is a party that puts the children in a country first. It asks the question ‘what sort of country would be best for our children as they grow to become adults?’. Obviously the answer to this question varies according to the location and history of a country. It is a question for areas of land called nation states because it involves permitting children to play freely. Children thrive outside, in the world.
The answer to the question of ‘what is best for our children as they grow to become adults?’ varies from place to place. In a country with a Muslim heritage the answer might be very different from that in a country with a Christian or Buddhist heritage. A country that is in the far north will have a different answer from an equatorial country. A country that believes in democracy or a particular system of law will need to guard these for the future of their children.
Most importantly, it is impossible to have a country that is best for our children if millions of people with other ideas are allowed to settle in it. The first step in permitting the growth of a country as an economy rather than as a society is to remove our children from the outside world. It is then possible to have free development of the land and free movement of people and goods.
If we compare Internationalism with Nationalism it is immediately obvious that Internationalists see government as a boon for the Political Class and Business Elite whereas Nationalists see government as the creation of an environment for the People. The Internationalists despise ordinary people who they regard as little more than troublesome human resources who must be managed into submission.
The 30 years of Uniparty rule in the UK has damaged the country so deeply that it is hard to imagine it recovering. The worst of this is that we did it. It is our fault. We voted for them. We forgot our priorities as a result of Uniparty indoctrination. We forgot that the priorities in politics are children, family, locality and nation. Without these priorities nothing good will ever come to our children, family, locality or nation.
Details
The Uniparty is financed by big business:
The declared funding is just a fraction of what is really received however, even the known funding is typical of Uniparty practice.
Cayman Islands based hedge fund Quadrature Capital Limited is the biggest donor to Labour. It donated £4m to the Labour party in 2024. It also has the Quadrature Climate Foundation that has given $1 billion to finance numerous Green charities in Africa etc. Each of its local charities is stimulating the formation of companies everywhere. Being charities they expect their donations to flow out across continents with no expectation of return. The money could become untraceable. The FBI has repeatedly warned about the use of Hedge Funds and private equity funds to launder money:
According to the FBI ‘threat actors’ such as criminals and foreign adversaries "use the private placement of funds, including investments offered by hedge funds and private equity firms" to reintegrate dirty money into the legitimate global financial system. …. The FBI assumes Anti Money Laundering programs are not adequately designed to monitor and detect threat actors' use of private investment funds to launder money. Additionally, the FBI assumes threat actors exploit this vulnerability to integrate illicit proceeds into the licit global financial system," (Reuters).
Labour Together Ltd is also supported by City funds and Foundations. It is wonderful to see the finance industry taking such a close interest in UK politics. So few businesses are known for entirely altruistic donations it is heartening to see Hedge Funds such as Quadrature and Green energy companies such as Ecotricity donating so much with no expectation of return. Expect Labour to fund sustainable ventures in Africa.
The Trade Unions are still substantial donors to Labour, the biggest four unions matching the biggest three corporate donors. However, we can no longer assume that money from fanatical union trotskyists will outbid the dubious corporate sector in control of the Party. We can, however, rest assured that both sources of donations are Internationalists and do not care a jot for British workers.
It is interesting that the Guyanan group such as Gina Miller and Lord Ali enjoy a ‘good Hedge Fund’ and our Foreign Secretary, the Guyanan David Lammy, has excellent offshore links. These people have been libelously called the ‘Guyanan Mafia’ but given that there is indeed Mafia activity in Guyana this is a shocking defamation. (“There are reports of the Italian mafia using the country’s financial system to launder hundreds of millions of dollars per year.” (Global Organised Crime Index)). Thank goodness those with roots in offshore financial centres are beyond the temptation of exploiting these. It would be so easy to do deals where payments from the UK to, say, charities in African countries, got untraceably skimmed off!
Everyone knows that the Conservatives are a big business party and received £7m from the Phoenix Partnership alone.
Uniparty leaders such as Cameron, Osborne, Blair and Clegg ‘retire’ into positions on the boards of multinational corporations. Blair gets a huge salary and ‘emergency’ payments from JP Morgan Chase, the giant investment bank. Cameron had a curious tenure on the board of a Chinese investment company that appeared as he resigned, paid him a few times and then disappeared.
Keir Starmer is an ardent Internationalist:
See
Poppy Gustafsson
The new Investment Minister is Poppy Gustafsson who was CEO of British company ‘Darktrace’ before selling it to US private equity business Thoma Bravo. Gustafsson was created by billionaire Mike Lynch’s venture capital fund ‘Invoke Capital’. Lynch was the tech entrepreneur who started Darktrace, and Gustafsson was the acceptable ‘front woman’, probably to avoid Darktrace being lumped with Autonomy, the company founded by Lynch that was the subject of a fraud trial in the USA (Financial Times). Darktrace is, of course, a WEF member. Gustafsson is also a close associate of the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change which appears to be involved in marketing highly expensive US made AI solutions (Oracle) to the British government. Lynch recently died mysteriously.
The Uniparty is a cult
Few Uniparty politicians have created businesses or built anything. Few understand even the basics of science, medicine or technology. They see themselves as experts in power and the control of populations. They reduce the country to adolescent economics with blocks of human resources, media, multinational corporations and financial industries that they move around a chessboard. They have little understanding of ordinary people and despise them.
Most Uniparty politicians studied subjects such as Politics, ‘Politics, Philosophy and Economics (PPE)’ and law at university. Although almost 50% of graduates emerge from university with science and technology subjects (STEM) they are barely represented in government:
This lack of scientific insight means they have no understanding of the modernised world that they worship with a cult intensity. They have no understanding that technologies are addictive and designed to replace people in the generation of money. Instead of asking how they should build and organise to create a nation that is like a garden that grows healthy and well balanced adults they ask ‘how can society be adjusted to generate money?’.
An excellent narrative John, thank you. I had a good understanding of the details, but it was great to see the additional data and facts presented, which have added clarity and ‘dot-connecting’ for me. I shall forward to my many likeminded contacts.