Does it matter who lives here?
Or where you live?
Replace the population of the USA or UK with Bangladeshis or Russians. Does it matter? Replace the constitution with that of Algeria or Germany, does it matter?
When you go to India is it any different from being in England? Is Italy any different? If England were full of no one but Italians and Italy were full of English people would it change either country?
I was recently lucky enough to hear a conversation on migration in a local pub. It was brief and largely involved middle class women virtue signalling and agreeing that Suella Braverman was a terrible woman for opposing migration. When I talk to people one on one about migration and inform them that English people are currently a minority in London, our capital city, and are now inevitably destined to be a minority in England they look blank. They know that it is racist to believe that there is anything wrong with replacing the population of England with people from Bangladesh or elsewhere.
I recently had a long discussion with an Islamic Indonesian who thought his country would be happier if it were governed by China. I asked him if he knew about the Chinese Social Credit system, “re-education” camps and the oppression of Islam. It turned out that he did not. The conversation slightly reminded me of talking to “Remain” supporters during the UK Referendum on Membership of the EU. Ask them whether they thought that loss of trial by jury, loss of the Common law or the danger of a reversion to German/French National Socialism (as authoritarian socialism + free markets) was desirable and they would look blank. The parallels were not exact, the Indonesian man was open to the truth whereas the Remainers were indoctrinated.
So what has happened? Why did ordinary English people believe that life would be the same whether the population is largely replaced or the system of government is changed? This question is a little historical because by c.2032 over half of schoolchildren in England will be non-English, the English will be a footnote in history, but it is still worth considering because we will gain insight into what the future has in store for us (See A Brief History of the English).
My hunch is that the “liberals” believe in International Human Rights. They are not at all discouraged by China being elected once again to a seat on the UN Human Rights Council. After all, dispersing and imprisoning millions of Uyghurs cannot be seen as a violation of Human Rights if you are a “liberal”. (Half a million Tibetans have been moved into work camps and about a million Uyghurs and other minorities have been put into a mixture of work and concentration camps). The “liberals” really want to believe that the world will be governed by the majority (China and India) according to ‘enlightened’, materialist values.
Of course the liberals are just useful idiots for the Multinational Corporations and Trotskyists who are driving the changes. The real motivations are money and power, as always.
The self deception of our times is so intense that playwrights and journalists produce documentaries and stage plays and articles like “Good”, which revisit NAZI Germany for the millionth time, rather than cover what is happening in the world now. National Socialism is rising again in China and being ignored.
Another factor in liberal apathy is that thanks to the Internet people have ceased being as local as they once were. They still have local schools, healthcare, roads and other services but their social contacts are dispersed. Academics are particularly internationalised. People’s thoughts roam around the latest message and photo from a distant friend rather than the local environment and people. They live in an Internet cloud and not on Earth.
The Internet is central to the changes that we are seeing. China has a huge investment in the destruction of the “Anglo-Saxon Hegemony” and the Internet is a major tool. In China the State controls the Internet, there is a National Firewall and Google has been replaced by Baidu which delivers Chinese government approved search results. China uses the Internet so skillfully in the West that if you search for “China social credit system” on Google your top results will be panegyrics describing the wonders of the system. Google itself is committed to the removal of borders and nation states so weights replies to online queries to favour its viewpoint.
The population of the West seems to be suffering from terminal boredom and disloyalty to their children. A half century of prosperity and dominance have made them arrogant and careless of what their forefathers achieved. Like spoilt children they will be the authors of their own undoing. The only consolation is that this happens to most empires.
This time round it doesn’t matter, why not have a country of Russians or Nigerians ruled by China in the British Isles or the USA? Our children can fend for themselves.
Meanwhile the liberal elite will continue to believe that the new population of the UK has exactly the same views and beliefs as the original population:
A change of population is also needed to ensure that the UK’s independence is given away:
It is comical that the bulk of the middle classes think that the migrant population will be just like the English despite these huge political differences. Fortunately they will share the consequences, which could even be rape of their female relations and pillage of all their goods if the Russia/China axis wins.