Dismantling Nations

John Sydenham

A Nation is a persistent collection of people based on family, friends, location, country and its God.

The reason that people desire the persistence of a nation is to guarantee what they consider to be a good future for their children and grandchildren. In this sense the Nation is an extension of the family.

Over a couple of generations there are powerful forces that affect a Nation. The most powerful are demography, the rise of empires, technology and economy, and environment. Demography can change a Nation if the people have too many or too few children or if vicious internal forces deliberately exchange the population for more tractable inhabitants. Empires absorb nations and change them to accept that the empire has the blueprint for a good society. Technology and economy can make the Nation prosperous which allows a welfare society with a safety net. If welfare is freely available this can make life into a game because there are no harsh consequences to actions and little need for those inclined to fecklessness to assure the future of their children. The true force of rapid environmental change has not got here yet, but it could have a drastic effect.

The external forces on society lead to the selection of ideas. The ideas that allow a Nation to persist will become prominent over two or three generations.

If a Nation is disintegrating it is the result of the selection of ideas that do not allow the Nation to persist. In a democracy this entails persuading a large proportion of the population that this should be the last generation of the Nation. How would they do this? Who might do such a thing?

Dismantling the Nation is done in reverse order. First remove the gods, form a government that is opposed to the nation, damage the locality, move people away from friends, collectivise the family. The objective is to atomise the people so they lose any vision of a united future for their children.

All Nations had tribal religions. These religions defined the rules for being a member of the Nation. Religions personify their teachings in the form of a God or gods. The simplest way to destroy a religion is to ‘prove’ - using science etc. - that the gods cannot exist. This works when applied to children and adolescents. Such proofs are, of course, non-sequitur to the purpose of a religion which is to prescribe a way of life. Revolutionaries will declare that ‘religion is the opium of the people’ etc.

In fact the personification of religious teachings is a potent method of teaching children because it draws the parallel between the teachings and parenting (ie:”Our Father who art in heaven”) and should not be casually abandoned. The gods, like Father Xmas, provide a basis for the acceptance and memorising of narratives by the young.

Once the way of life that is based on religious teachings is removed half of your work of destroying a Nation is done.

Having got rid of any religious adherence to a way of life the next step is to get rid of social adherence to that way of life, to destroy the culture of the nation.

The normalisation of insanity is an important precursor to any culture war. Insanity occurs when a person is mentally unable to cope with normal life or is highly irrational. The “normalisation” of insanity depends on the false precept that society can absorb any amount of aberrant behaviour and thought and that insanity is not contagious. Without this acceptance normalisation would not occur. Contagion of insanity is evident when public figures are insane and propagate their views in the media and when groups coalesce around anxious or depressive behaviour etc. and become less functional. Most persistent societies are wary of insanity, they do not normalise it. They offer places of asylum to the insane and help them change themselves to integrate with society.

Having normalised insanity the concept that ‘truth’ does not exist becomes acceptable. “Everyone has their own truth” becomes a truism. Anarchic philosophers evolved postmodernism and poststructuralism to accomplish this change in the humanities but they stood on the shoulders of people like Thomas Szasz who saw insanity as a personal truth. Postmodernism and poststructuralism are potent ideas for changing society.

If the Arts are postmodern and poststructuralist they challenge established thought. This sells works of art whether these are pictures or comedy shows. This can be a good thing, and is often commercial, but if the media become all pervasive and the false proposition that there is no truth becomes widely accepted then there really will be no truth. Nowhere will there be a repository of truth or people who even know what truth is. The acceptance of the normalisation of “no truth” depends on the false precept that society can absorb any amount of aberrant behaviour and thought.

Another method of destroying a culture is to make many forms of discrimination between people illegal. Discrimination is the foundation of any group of people. People choose their friends, they go to events that interest them, they view films and read stories about particular groups of people, they employ qualified people etc. Discrimination on the basis of colour of skin or hair etc. is absurd and most people would agree with this. However, if you want to dismantle a society you introduce laws that say it is illegal to discriminate on the basis of colour of skin OR nationality. The nation must then absorb other national cultures. Those who support this will argue that it enriches the national culture. They will accuse opponents of being unreasoning bigots who hate black people and carefully hide the bit about foreign cultures. But what happens when the foreign nationalities become a sizeable fraction or even the majority of the population? The normalisation of banning discrimination depends on the false precept that society can absorb any amount of aberrant behaviour and thought. Without this acceptance normalisation would not occur.

There are many other methods of disrupting society. Perhaps the best is to move almost all adolescents away from home when they leave school. This can be done easily by abandoning local, technical, further education that is linked to local business. This can be augmented by focusing industry and commerce on relatively few sites so that people must move house to find work. Ensure that there is a ready availability of humanities courses that require little ability.

Having disrupted society the next, major objective is the destruction of the family. Ensure that all dramas are about single people or portray family break up. Provide full support for single parents. Remove any stigma from the breaking of vows (absolute promises) between men and women. Treat the idea of a man supporting a family as an archaic idea and ensure that women and men occupy the workplace equally. Detach the women from their family and children by training them from an early age that working for an employer is far more important than devoting yourself to your family. Destroy the old order where a family was a joint enterprise. If husband and wife no longer see themselves as a family, meeting the world together, then their love will wither. Women will have so little affection for having children that the Nation will naturally die out - this is happening.

There are more measures for destroying a Nation such as controlling the media, open borders, multiculturalism, affiliation to empires like the EU etc., but the key measures are described above. Once the foundations are laid so that there is no vision of a united future it is easy to ladle on the extras. There will be little resistance.

Now, who would want to do all of this? Obviously it is people who wish to destroy nations. But why?

There are three groups who desire the end of our nations. These are multinational corporations, various forms of international socialists and geopolitical enemies such as China and Russia. The multinationals are the real power but the international socialists are the foot soldiers. They have done an amazing job, however, this is not surprising when we consider the financial clout of the multinationals, the fanaticism of the socialists and the growing power of China.

In the UK the “One Nation Conservatives” represent the multinationals and the termination of the Nation State and the Labour Party are international socialists who favour China. Together they form the “Uniparty”.

The corporate “One Nation Conservatives” are ruthless because they represent multinational corporations and do not give a fig for the People. Even their name is a cynical ploy to make the ill-informed think they have the interests of the country at heart. These cynics will always lie to attain their ends.

The Uniparty has slowly atomised the British people so that there are as many ideas of the future as there are small groups of people. This makes the Nation easy to dispose of because there are few centres of power within the people.

The far left Labour Party has realised that the fundamental step when dismantling a society is the realisation that people who are under 25 years old have no idea about the past. The young are a clean slate. If you want to dismantle a society you must start with education and the indoctrination of the young. Almost all teachers are Labour supporters and recruited to the program of dismantling society although few of them probably realise that this is what they are doing. The Nation must not trust teachers to be impartial.

If we wish to restore the Nation the formula is simple. A Nation is a persistent collection of people based on family, friends, location, country and its God. It is possible to create, or re-create, a nation by first and foremost strengthening the family. Any vision of the future should begin with the good of our children. We are custodians of this land for them.