5 Comments

Steve,

Thanks very much for your article. Will take me a while to digest it, but you are clearly a thoughtful guy with a good grasp of the subject.

Lockwood and I arrived at the same conclusion (found below), independently of one another. Our views comport with everything I know about the relevant physics, philosophy, neuroscience & etc.

______

Consciousness, in other words, provides us with a kind of ‘window’ on to our brains, making possible a

transparent grasp of a tiny corner of a material reality that is in general opaque to us, knowable only at

one remove. The qualities of which we are immediately aware, in consciousness, precisely are some at

least of the intrinsic qualities of the states and processes that go to make up the material world — morespecifically, states and processes within our own brains.

The psychologist Pribram . . . has made an interesting attempt to revive an idea originally put forward

around the turn of the century by the Ge stalt psychologists: namely that it is certain fields, in the

physicist’s sense, within the cerebral hemispheres, that may be the immediate objects of introspective

awareness ... What it would amount to, in terms of the present proposal, is that we have a ‘special’ or

‘privileged’ access, via some of our own brain activity, to the intrinsic character of, say,

electromagnetism. Put like that, the idea sounds pretty fanciful. But make no mistake about it: whether

about electromagnetism or about other such phenomena, that is just what the Russellian view ostensibly commits one to saying.

~Lockwood, 'Mind, Brain & Quantum'

See also the work of Devalois on retinotopic maps.

Expand full comment